Since his debut almost ten years ago, the work of Sterling Ruby (b. 1972, American Air Force Base in Bittburg, Germany; lives and works in Los Angeles) has confronted the viewer through a large variety of media, from ceramics to collages, videos, spray paintings and sculptures in a wide array of materials. The artist’s crosscutting approach to techniques, his almost overwhelming visual output, initially disoriented critics and the public, but then they rapidly became the place for thematic and conceptual coherence that is as deep as it is rigorous.
Monument Stalagmite/P.T.A.C
(2012), in the David and Indrė Roberts Collection, London, is part of a broader series of works – all titled Monument Stalagmite – made through a slow process of
pouring liquid urethane over an armature of PVC and foam. The liquid urethane is poured over a structure hanging from the ceiling and subsequent layers are accumulated over a long period of time (nearly two months for each sculpture), evoking both processes of geological sedimentation and instantaneous formation. The ensuing form, which closely resembles a stalactite, is then removed from the ceiling to which it was anchored and is displayed upright on a pedestal, so that it visually evokes a stalagmite. Liquid urethane is a material that has been part of Ruby’s artistic production from the very beginning: works made with it were already present in Monument to Interiority, the thesis exhibition the artist held in 2005 at the Art Centre College of Design in Pasadena. This complex installation of various materials also included another of the artist’s iconic types of works: ceramics.
There is a direct relationship between the use of ceramic and that of urethane, a relationship worth exploring as it magnifies the subject of ‘monumentality’ that is central to understanding Ruby’s work as a whole. In fact, the large sculptures in the Monument Stalagmite series can be viewed
as an extension and consequence of the formal and conceptual preoccupations the artist began to explore during the years of his academic training, when he began to experiment with ceramics in amateur courses. While Ruby was initially attracted to the associations between the malleability of clay and its use in therapeutic settings, he later grasped the possibility of transforming the different phases of ceramic production into a figure of individual education and constraint. The expressive and spontaneous gesture that exists before irreversible formalisation is what piqued Ruby’s interest in ceramics: